Archives For Venture Captial

via WilmerHale

New Reports find IPOs on the Rise in California, Venture Capital Down Slightly

Two new reports find the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) in California grew in 2012 and is likely to continue strong in 2013, with six new IPOs already in 2013. At the same time, venture capital (VC) investing declined slightly but the state is expected to maintain its leadership role, as the No. 1 source for VC-backed companies.

For more on California and national trends, please see the 2013 IPO Report (p. 8) and the 2013 Venture Capital Report (p. 6).

Among the California findings were:

· California IPOs rose 33% in 2012 from 2011, but the median offering size declined 19%.
· California should produce significant IPO activity in 2013, including offerings from social media, biotechnology and clean-tech companies. Already it’s had six IPOs in the first quarter of 2013: KaloBios Pharmaceuticals ($70 million), Marin Software ($105 million), Model N ($104.5 million), Silver Spring Networks ($80.8 million), TRI Pointe Homes ($233 million) and Xoom ($101 million).
· The state’s average IPO ended 2012 up 23% from its offering price.
· The state experienced a slight dip in VC financing in 2012– although the year’s deal tally was the second largest since the dot-com boom of 2000.
· California was responsible for 40% of financing transactions in 2012, including the five largest VC-backed IPOs of 2012.

Two Palo Alto-based partners in the WilmerHale law firm, who helped prepare the reports, are available to comment on them: Peter Buckland, co-chair of the firm’s Emerging Company and Venture Capital Practice Group, and Daniel Zimmermann, a partner in the Corporate, Emerging Company and Venture Capital Practice Groups. Please contact me to schedule an interview: Laura Mecoy, 310.546.5860 or lmecoy@stantoncomm.com

Here is some additional information about the two reports and third report on M&A activity around the country:

WilmerHale’s 2013 IPO Report offers a detailed analysis of, and outlook for, the IPO market. The report features regional breakdowns, a Q&A with former SEC Corp Fin Director Meredith Cross, and a discussion of the use of social media for investor communications under Regulation FD. It provides data on the elements of relief being chosen by emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act; offers practical insight on “test-the-waters” communications and scheduling the first annual meeting of stockholders; summarizes IPO disclosure requirements applicable to directors, officers, 5% stockholders and selling stockholders; discusses Form 10 IPOs as an alternative route to going public and presents useful IPO market metrics that are ordinarily unavailable elsewhere.

The 2013 Venture Capital Report offers an in-depth analysis of, and outlook for, the US and European venture capital markets. The report features industry and regional breakdowns, an analysis of trends in venture capital financing and VC-backed company M&A deal terms, a look at the federal tax advantages of investments in “qualified small business stock,” and a discussion of JOBS Act benefits for startups that never plan to go public.

The firm’s 2013 M&A Report contains a detailed review of, and outlook for, the global M&A market. Other highlights include a discussion of the challenges and benefits of selling a company in a “dual-track” IPO, a comparison of public and private acquisitions, an analysis of issues and opportunities in California M&A deals, and a review of takeover defenses adopted by public companies.

via WilmerHale

New Reports find IPOs on the Rise in California, Venture Capital Down Slightly

Two new reports find the number of initial public offerings (IPOs) in California grew in 2012 and is likely to continue strong in 2013, with six new IPOs already in 2013. At the same time, venture capital (VC) investing declined slightly but the state is expected to maintain its leadership role, as the No. 1 source for VC-backed companies.

For more on California and national trends, please see the 2013 IPO Report (p. 8) and the 2013 Venture Capital Report (p. 6).

Among the California findings were:

· California IPOs rose 33% in 2012 from 2011, but the median offering size declined 19%.
· California should produce significant IPO activity in 2013, including offerings from social media, biotechnology and clean-tech companies. Already it’s had six IPOs in the first quarter of 2013: KaloBios Pharmaceuticals ($70 million), Marin Software ($105 million), Model N ($104.5 million), Silver Spring Networks ($80.8 million), TRI Pointe Homes ($233 million) and Xoom ($101 million).
· The state’s average IPO ended 2012 up 23% from its offering price.
· The state experienced a slight dip in VC financing in 2012– although the year’s deal tally was the second largest since the dot-com boom of 2000.
· California was responsible for 40% of financing transactions in 2012, including the five largest VC-backed IPOs of 2012.

Two Palo Alto-based partners in the WilmerHale law firm, who helped prepare the reports, are available to comment on them: Peter Buckland, co-chair of the firm’s Emerging Company and Venture Capital Practice Group, and Daniel Zimmermann, a partner in the Corporate, Emerging Company and Venture Capital Practice Groups. Please contact me to schedule an interview: Laura Mecoy, 310.546.5860 or lmecoy@stantoncomm.com

Here is some additional information about the two reports and third report on M&A activity around the country:

WilmerHale’s 2013 IPO Report offers a detailed analysis of, and outlook for, the IPO market. The report features regional breakdowns, a Q&A with former SEC Corp Fin Director Meredith Cross, and a discussion of the use of social media for investor communications under Regulation FD. It provides data on the elements of relief being chosen by emerging growth companies under the JOBS Act; offers practical insight on “test-the-waters” communications and scheduling the first annual meeting of stockholders; summarizes IPO disclosure requirements applicable to directors, officers, 5% stockholders and selling stockholders; discusses Form 10 IPOs as an alternative route to going public and presents useful IPO market metrics that are ordinarily unavailable elsewhere.

The 2013 Venture Capital Report offers an in-depth analysis of, and outlook for, the US and European venture capital markets. The report features industry and regional breakdowns, an analysis of trends in venture capital financing and VC-backed company M&A deal terms, a look at the federal tax advantages of investments in “qualified small business stock,” and a discussion of JOBS Act benefits for startups that never plan to go public.

The firm’s 2013 M&A Report contains a detailed review of, and outlook for, the global M&A market. Other highlights include a discussion of the challenges and benefits of selling a company in a “dual-track” IPO, a comparison of public and private acquisitions, an analysis of issues and opportunities in California M&A deals, and a review of takeover defenses adopted by public companies.

investing in women

 

Sources for data include: 

Gatekeepers of Venture Growth: The Role & Participation of Women in the Venture Capital IndustryIlluminate Ventures,  Venture Human Capital Report CBInsights Jan-Jun2010Woman Report Economic Clout American ExpressUNH Center for Venture ResearchKauffman Index of Entrepreneurial Activity (KIEA)Gem Report 2010Silicon Valley Board Index 2011Dow Jones VentureSourceNational Venture Capital Association estimates, Scott Duke Harris’s July 2010 article Mercury News, World Economic Forum Global 2009 Gender Gap Index2007 survey by British Researcher Library House, Women in Leadership in Information Society, Kauffman Foundation surveyUS Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, Center for Venture Research New Hampshire.



Next week kicks off the StartupMonthly‘s Smart$Money Executive Program in Silicon Valley November 12-15. The StartupMonthly Smart$Money Executive program informs, inspires, educates, and prepares business angels and venture capitalists for their future investments in IT startups. During the program, investors will share and learn about angel and VC investments, deal-structure, market trends, and the Silicon Valley ecosystem. Along with connecting to leading investors in Silicon Valley and visiting successful startups and companies such as Microsoft, Facebook, and Google. Also visiting accelerator programs such as 500 Startups.

I’m currently participating in Astia Angel Investor training and will be on the Angels Best Practices panel moderator by my good friend Robert Scoble on Tuesday during the Smart$Money Executive Program. Other panelist include Jeff Pulver, Zohar Levkovitz, Bill Reichart, Neal Strickberger, and Prashant Shah.

StartupMonthly’s Smart$Money Executive Program is organized by Pemo Theodore @pemo Media Producer, startup coach & founder EZebis: Winning the Venture Game!

The event overall has a rock star VC/investor line up including Steve Blank, Vivek Wadhwa, Cathy Lego , Chris Yeh and more. Take a look

Are we in a bubble or not is still a question many tech journalist are debating and investors are risking millions hoping we’re not to receive a significant amount of return on their investment. Only time will tell but we have data providing some insights that 2012 is peaking close to the venture capital market of the 2000s also known as the “dot com days”.

CB insights which provides tools for those engaged in private equity, venture capital, corporate development, investment banking, corporate innovation & strategy, angel investment and consulting provides recently posted their quarterly venture capital report (Q3 2012) which states that $7.5 billion was invested in 835 Companies. Let’s take a look at more data from the report to analyze the investment sector.

[gview file="http://socialwaynecdn.socialwaynecom.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Q3-2012-Venture-Capital-Activity-Report-CB-Insights.pdf" width="100%" save="0"]

BIGGER, FASTER SEED PLANTING
Seed investing represented 31% of all VC deals. Mobile saw 42% of its deal volume at the Seed VC level. Healthcare also saw growth in Seed investing as well.

Both internet and mobile saw larger Seed VC medians hitting the $1 million mark for the first time suggesting that the frenzy for Seed VC investing is allowing entrepreneurs to raise larger seed rounds than in the past.

NY DOES IT SMALLER; MAYBE NOT A ONE-TRICK PONY
New York deal count hit five quarter high but is dominated by lots of small Seed VC deals (49% of deals). Although still very tech dominated, the quarter did see NY register signs of life in both green tech and healthcare which typically are nowhere to be found.

THE MOBILE WILD WEST
VCs clearly are positioning themselves for the next big wave they see in mobile. While big deals insecurity and payments buoyed funding totals, the deal breakdown by industry within mobile remains diverse. For the first time, Cali actually saw more activity to the mobile sector than Healthcare.

It’s an interesting time to be an entrepreneur and an investor with the market showing tremendous growth in the seed stage. Meaning if there’s a bubble it won’t replicate the days of the 2000s that caused the centure capital meltdown.

Also see CBInights – Angel Investment Report – First Half 2012


Via David Foster for Mashable

P8036167.JPG
flickr photo by Lakewood Croquet Club

I’m a firm believer that everyone is somebody no matter what title or status they have. Neither one phases me. I’ve met Presidents, NBA Players such as Michael Jordan, a Princes and billionaire investors who can change your life with a stroke of the pen or a tweet. But as an entrepreneur in the Venture Capital, Angel Investor and technology startup space you do need to know and understand the role of the person you’re pitching to.

For example two startups I was working with earlier this year both had meetings with the same VC firm. One met with founders and partners and the other met with associate. The startup who met with partners had a direct line of communication on the investing decision making process and the startup that met with associate were in a wait and see mode to learn if they would even get an email or call back to pitch to the partners. This is not always the case at VC firms but depending on who you’re meeting with it can speed up or slow down the process or you may not get a second chance. Regardless who you meet/pitch with I would be as well prepared as possible no matter what their title. There are also more titles than Partners and Associates such as:

  • Managing Director
  • General Partner
  • Venture Partner
  • Managing Partner
  • Managing Director
  • Partner
  • Principal
  • Associates
  • Analyst
  • Scouts
  • Entrepreneur in residence (EIR)

For learning more about the Venture Capital space Quora is a good source of information. I suggest you follow both the Angel Investing and Venture Capital topics. Below is Ask the VC answer to what some of the Venture Capital Titles mean that was posted on Quora.

Question: What is a “venture partner” and how do they compare to a “Partner” and / or “Managing Director?” And what exactly is a “Principal?” How are each compensated?

Our Take: Titles have widely varied meanings in the VC world. Unlike most other professions, there aren’t hard “rules” about what means what. But here goes…

- “Managing Director” / “General Partner” (MDs / GPs): In whatever VC organization you are dealing with, this is the top of the food chain. The titles mean effectively the same things, but many lawyers get nervous letting their clients use the term “General Partner” because this term equates to unlimited personal liability in the partnership paradigm. Therefore, the term “Managing Director” is used. Rest assured that all of them refer to each other as “partners” in conversation. MDs and GPs are compensated through management fees and receive direct carry in the funds. They essentially run the firm, engage in fundraising and vote on the deals the firm considers executing. Note, that some larger firms have smaller committees of MDs / GPs that wield most or all of the power.

- “Venture Partner” / “Partner” (VPs): This is generally the next step down the ladder, but not always. In most organizations, Venture Partners / Partners source new deals, sit on boards and act in the eyes of start-up companies just like MDs and GPs. In contrast, VPs may not have carry in the funds themselves, rather deal-specific carry for companies in which they are involved in. In some firms, however, they do have general fund carry. What’s most interesting is that some VPs are really MDs in training, while others are folks who just don’t want to be an MD, or are explicitly only intending to be at the VC for a finite period of time. At some firms, MDs / GPs who have “retired” (either voluntarily or involuntarily) are made VPs. In other words this position can be a position “on the way up,” “on the way down / out,” or “just hanging out for a while.” VPs can or can not make a salary off of the management fees. We’ve seen ranges from $50,000 a year on up to several hundreds of thousands of dollars. It can also be a full or part time position. You see everyone from young bucks trying to make their way up the ladder, to seasoned company executives becoming first time investors. Whatever the case, you rarely see these folks having another job (full-time operation roles at companies) while they are working for the VC firm.

- “Principal / Associates”: As with VPs, this functional responsibilities of Principals and Associates can range from “number crunching deal monkeys” to folks who source deals, sit on boards and act as junior partners. At some firms, the role of Principal immediately preceeds the role of Managing Director. Generally, they are younger folks who are learning the ropes and depending on the firm will each have their own level of autonomy and compensation. Rarely do they have a vote in deals and it’s probably about 50% of them who have direct fund carry. They are compensated through management fees, as most of them are still trying to pay off their business school loans.

For more about “Scouts” read a recent pando daily discovery. VCs in Angels’ Clothing: The Sneaky New Trend of “Deal Scouts” in Silicon Valley