Archives For Silicon Valley

Managing Startups: Best Posts of 2012

Here’s my compilation of 2012′s best posts about managing startups. I assembled similar lists at the end of 2011, 2010 and 2009. Many thanks to all of the authors. The generosity of the startup community is amazing, and these insights are invaluable to those of us who teach and coach aspiring entrepreneurs.

Apologies to authors whose work I’ve omitted. Please use comments below to suggest additional posts. Happy New Year!

via Platforms and Networks: Managing Startups: Best Posts of 2012.

Are we in a bubble or not is still a question many tech journalist are debating and investors are risking millions hoping we’re not to receive a significant amount of return on their investment. Only time will tell but we have data providing some insights that 2012 is peaking close to the venture capital market of the 2000s also known as the “dot com days”.

CB insights which provides tools for those engaged in private equity, venture capital, corporate development, investment banking, corporate innovation & strategy, angel investment and consulting provides recently posted their quarterly venture capital report (Q3 2012) which states that $7.5 billion was invested in 835 Companies. Let’s take a look at more data from the report to analyze the investment sector.

[gview file="http://socialwaynecdn.socialwaynecom.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Q3-2012-Venture-Capital-Activity-Report-CB-Insights.pdf" width="100%" save="0"]

BIGGER, FASTER SEED PLANTING
Seed investing represented 31% of all VC deals. Mobile saw 42% of its deal volume at the Seed VC level. Healthcare also saw growth in Seed investing as well.

Both internet and mobile saw larger Seed VC medians hitting the $1 million mark for the first time suggesting that the frenzy for Seed VC investing is allowing entrepreneurs to raise larger seed rounds than in the past.

NY DOES IT SMALLER; MAYBE NOT A ONE-TRICK PONY
New York deal count hit five quarter high but is dominated by lots of small Seed VC deals (49% of deals). Although still very tech dominated, the quarter did see NY register signs of life in both green tech and healthcare which typically are nowhere to be found.

THE MOBILE WILD WEST
VCs clearly are positioning themselves for the next big wave they see in mobile. While big deals insecurity and payments buoyed funding totals, the deal breakdown by industry within mobile remains diverse. For the first time, Cali actually saw more activity to the mobile sector than Healthcare.

It’s an interesting time to be an entrepreneur and an investor with the market showing tremendous growth in the seed stage. Meaning if there’s a bubble it won’t replicate the days of the 2000s that caused the centure capital meltdown.

Also see CBInights – Angel Investment Report – First Half 2012

Somewhere in a coffee shop
Yeah… let’s celebrate! An entrepreneur just crowdfunded $500,000.00 to build the next big thing. Oh wait… No he’s building a Twitter clone. What? Do we really need another Twitter? But it’s going to be open, have an API and no Ads like Twitter was before they decided to start making tons of money. Um.. One more thing, it’s going to be real-time and for developers! Ok, so it’s Twitter meets Githup without the ads?

Let’s get a few things straight before I continue and don’t want to sound too much like a hater or sceptic about Dalton Caldwell’s App.net and the croundfunded model, but over the last few years I’ve had tons of entrepreneurs reach out to me either for advice, mentorship or trying to get into the accelerator I help launch saying they’re working on the next big thing, or they have the next facebook or twitter. My first reaction would be really and almost from that point the conversation would go downhill from there as they have done very little customer development or have yet to state the one reason why or how they’re going to get 955 million users. As an entrepreneur just saying you’re going to build the next twitter or facebook is almost a red flag to potential investors. With very little traction, an incomplete product or an awesome team good luck on the funding. Better yet, saying you’re going to build the next big thing without clearly stating what problem you’re solving that’s different than what the current big thing is another red flag. But Dalton Caldwell is NOT a first time entrepreneur!

Let me say that I have never met Dalton before or at least I don’t think I have, but I’m sure we have been in the same room before(I think). Regardless here’s a brief history lesson on Dalton. In 2004 by Dalton Caldwell and some former engineers from Napster launched imeem which was sold to myspace and then shutdown. In February 2010 Dalton launched Mixed Media Labs which created picplz, a photo broadcasting application for iPhone and Android mobile devices which eventually separated from the company then raised $5M From Andreessen Horowitz . In September 2012 Picplz shutdown (instagram won). Before Picplz shutdown Dalton launched App.net a platform for the distribution and monetization of iOS and Android mobile apps in March of 2012. Around July 2012 Dalton and team pivots App.net with a plan to build a “dependable, ad-free version of Twitter”. Whew! I may be off here or there but I’m close on the dates.

Sources: CrunchBase: Dalton CaldwellApp.netPicplz - TechCrunch

When I first heard of App.net first piviot I was like, wait don’t we have an open source, ad-free version of twitter already? It’s called http://identi.ca . Anyway, I was very impressed with the the tool App.net created to crowdfund to raise funds. It very much reminded me of kick starter. I was thinking why not white label the site as a tool, allowing anyone to host and manage their own kickstarter campaign. Just an idea. Still I kept my RSS loaded and kept an eye on App.net. Currently App.net has 8,269 backers, with $555,700 and 34 hours left. When it’s all said and done Dalton may reach $600 to $650k. Then all eyes will be on App.net. Everything the company does good or bad will be covered in the beloved tech press and Dalton is now the new face of crowdfunding startups.

Doesn’t this all sound too familiar? Remember Diaspora? What happen to those guys who were building an open Facebook? Diaspora raised $200k using kickstarter. Visit the https://www.joindiaspora.com lading page for updates. Just like Diaspora, timing was everything for Dalton and team. Diaspora launched their fundraising efforts when the media was crushing facebook on security, data export and privacy. For Dalton’s App.net things were not as agressive against Twitter but Dalton used hackernews, an open letter to Mark Zuckerberg on his blog about an Facebook Acqui-Hire attempt and today a without any term sheets a nice crowdfunded $500k and growing. Heck, maybe I need to stop writing and get to kickstarting….

There are a lot of lessons to be learned from all of this. Here are a few:

  • Build and ship fast when funding raising
  • Have a great development team
  • Attack a pain point to attract people to join you. For App.net the pain was ads
  • Be persistent
  • Learn from your failures
  • When you raise capital spend it wisely
  • Make noise so the rest of the world will listen ( the facebook post was epic)
  • Be passionate
  • Have a great landing page and hype up your product in the tech press
  • Don’t be afraid to take on giants
  • Ignore the criticism and stay focus
  • Never give up.

I’m no first time entrepreneur but I’ve been there. If you’re somewhere like in Detroit, North Carolina or Atlanta and thinking you’ll just bootstrap your startup or crowdfund $500k like App.net I would think twice about that especially if you don’t have a strong team or a product. Many first time entrepreneur would just love to raise $100k. Still at Ben Parr tweets:

Now the hard work begins and six months a year or two from now let’s see where Dalton and the App.net will be. My bet is Dalton will join some VC firm or another startup will swoop in and acquire the team and product and all of this will be washed up in more fairy tales of Silicon Valley.

Hats off Dalton Caldwell, we’re proud and watching you.

P8036167.JPG
flickr photo by Lakewood Croquet Club

I’m a firm believer that everyone is somebody no matter what title or status they have. Neither one phases me. I’ve met Presidents, NBA Players such as Michael Jordan, a Princes and billionaire investors who can change your life with a stroke of the pen or a tweet. But as an entrepreneur in the Venture Capital, Angel Investor and technology startup space you do need to know and understand the role of the person you’re pitching to.

For example two startups I was working with earlier this year both had meetings with the same VC firm. One met with founders and partners and the other met with associate. The startup who met with partners had a direct line of communication on the investing decision making process and the startup that met with associate were in a wait and see mode to learn if they would even get an email or call back to pitch to the partners. This is not always the case at VC firms but depending on who you’re meeting with it can speed up or slow down the process or you may not get a second chance. Regardless who you meet/pitch with I would be as well prepared as possible no matter what their title. There are also more titles than Partners and Associates such as:

  • Managing Director
  • General Partner
  • Venture Partner
  • Managing Partner
  • Managing Director
  • Partner
  • Principal
  • Associates
  • Analyst
  • Scouts
  • Entrepreneur in residence (EIR)

For learning more about the Venture Capital space Quora is a good source of information. I suggest you follow both the Angel Investing and Venture Capital topics. Below is Ask the VC answer to what some of the Venture Capital Titles mean that was posted on Quora.

Question: What is a “venture partner” and how do they compare to a “Partner” and / or “Managing Director?” And what exactly is a “Principal?” How are each compensated?

Our Take: Titles have widely varied meanings in the VC world. Unlike most other professions, there aren’t hard “rules” about what means what. But here goes…

- “Managing Director” / “General Partner” (MDs / GPs): In whatever VC organization you are dealing with, this is the top of the food chain. The titles mean effectively the same things, but many lawyers get nervous letting their clients use the term “General Partner” because this term equates to unlimited personal liability in the partnership paradigm. Therefore, the term “Managing Director” is used. Rest assured that all of them refer to each other as “partners” in conversation. MDs and GPs are compensated through management fees and receive direct carry in the funds. They essentially run the firm, engage in fundraising and vote on the deals the firm considers executing. Note, that some larger firms have smaller committees of MDs / GPs that wield most or all of the power.

- “Venture Partner” / “Partner” (VPs): This is generally the next step down the ladder, but not always. In most organizations, Venture Partners / Partners source new deals, sit on boards and act in the eyes of start-up companies just like MDs and GPs. In contrast, VPs may not have carry in the funds themselves, rather deal-specific carry for companies in which they are involved in. In some firms, however, they do have general fund carry. What’s most interesting is that some VPs are really MDs in training, while others are folks who just don’t want to be an MD, or are explicitly only intending to be at the VC for a finite period of time. At some firms, MDs / GPs who have “retired” (either voluntarily or involuntarily) are made VPs. In other words this position can be a position “on the way up,” “on the way down / out,” or “just hanging out for a while.” VPs can or can not make a salary off of the management fees. We’ve seen ranges from $50,000 a year on up to several hundreds of thousands of dollars. It can also be a full or part time position. You see everyone from young bucks trying to make their way up the ladder, to seasoned company executives becoming first time investors. Whatever the case, you rarely see these folks having another job (full-time operation roles at companies) while they are working for the VC firm.

- “Principal / Associates”: As with VPs, this functional responsibilities of Principals and Associates can range from “number crunching deal monkeys” to folks who source deals, sit on boards and act as junior partners. At some firms, the role of Principal immediately preceeds the role of Managing Director. Generally, they are younger folks who are learning the ropes and depending on the firm will each have their own level of autonomy and compensation. Rarely do they have a vote in deals and it’s probably about 50% of them who have direct fund carry. They are compensated through management fees, as most of them are still trying to pay off their business school loans.

For more about “Scouts” read a recent pando daily discovery. VCs in Angels’ Clothing: The Sneaky New Trend of “Deal Scouts” in Silicon Valley

Kapor Capital Fellows Presentation Day


Uriri Onovakpuri welcoming the crowd at Kapor Capital Fellows Presentation Day

Lately I’ve been heads down doing customer development, coding and product management over the past few months but over the last six days I came up for air to attend three great events. The first one was TechCrunch Crunchup and August Capital Party. The second was Kapor Capital Fellows Presentation Day and the third was the Google Ventures Summer BBQ. The Google Ventures Summer BBQ and the Kapor Capital Fellows Presentation Day were by invitation but the TechCrunch Crunchup and August Capital Party was just a small investment but worth it to connect with some of well known angel investors and Venture Capitalist firms in Silicon Valley.

It was my second year in a row attending both the TechCrunch Crunchup / August Capital Party and the Google Ventures Summer BBQ. Both events have a sort of it’s August let’s have some fun/celebrate along with let’s see who’s in the room type vibe to it. By the way, I learned last year that not all but “some” Venture Capitalist take the entire month of August off. I’ve heard for various reasons such as the weather, it’s the end of summer or just because they can. Regardless if you’re a startup looking to setup meetings I would skip August. You may be saying but that’s only for Silicon Valley or San Francisco but I was talking the a venture partner who lives in the midwest this week and she was going on vacation starting today.

_SJP3514

flickr photo by TechCrunch

As for what makes TechCrunch Crunchup / August Capital Party and the Google Ventures Summer BBQ a must attend event for startup founders, it’s the investors. Not only do leading VC firms attend both but associates, analysts and scouts (more on VC firms titles in a later post). Both events are an opportunity to connect over open bars, food and great weather. Note I didn’t say pitch but as I mentioned in my “Angel Investors and Venture Capitalist Are People Too” post event when you’re not pitching you’re always pitching. But at these events the environment is a lot more causal and often you see ycombinator founders or other season entrepreneurs attending. The vibe at the Google Ventures BBQ is a little more close, friends and family atmosphere with a lot of google ventures backed companies or sponsored organizations in a attendance.

Attending theses type events are no guarantee to funding or rewards with any badges or Silicon Valley street creed but when your out networking and key investors keep seeing you at certain events and if you engage with them correctly you never know where it could lead too. It’s all about the relationships.

_SJP3800
flickr photo by TechCrunch

As for me attending both I learned more about VC community and what tools they use internally. I connected with five new VC firms I didn’t have contact person at, I made a lead with an angel investor, more customer development with seasoned high level entrepreneurs and investors. Along with being about to setup a few meetings. It was a good past six days between events and I was still able to work on some UI and jump in some code but all was not a walk in the park. During the August Capital party I accidentally knocked a cup out of the hand of investor while in front of a few techcrunch writers. I don’t drink so it was me being clumsy. During the google ventures bbq I couldn’t decide if I wanted to approach a founder of a very influential investor platform or not. When I almost made my mind to walk over he got on the phone and then left the event. Luckily I know how to reach him when the time is right. Also during the August Capital event I waited for a break in a conversation to talk with a partner at a very well known VC firm. When I walked over and introduced myself and then stated I was doing customer development and had a question for him. He simply started to laugh and then said let him finish the conversation he was in before someone else had already disrupted the conversation. I was kinda surprised by his “laugh first’ response to beginning of our dialogue. I made a mental note and going to use it as motivation when the time is right. Ironically I saw the same venture capitalist at the google ventures bbq but decided not to try to approach him there.

Google ventures BBQ

Overall good times but still tons of work to do. When you’re at events like these it’s easy to get caught up in the Silicon Valley hype. Espcially when you’re at like you can smell the “billions” in the room and you look around and standing next to Twitter, Path and Facebook employees, investors such as Dave McClure, Kevin Rose and partners form greylock partners, andreessen horowitz and the CrunchFund. The way I look at it, until I’m a VC or doing more to invest into future entrepreneurs there’s tons of work to get done.

What are your must attend events to connect with entrepreneurs and venture capitalist?

PS. I did happen in the make it in the instagram photo that Kevin Rose took at the Google Ventures BBQ. Look to the left in stripes.



Google Ventures summer BBQ! :)

PS #2. I also had a chance to talk with some of the Google Glasses team.
Google glasses at google ventures