Posted on October 17, 2009 - by Wayne Sutton
BlogWorld Video Interview: Jermaine Dupri @LTLline on blogs, music & social media #bwe09
Jermine Dupri was one of the celebrities to be apart of the “The New Celebrity” keynote panel at BlogWorld Expo 2009. After the keynote I had a chance to interview Jermine Dupri about blogs, the future of the music industry, what insprires him, and social media etiquette. Take a look.
Are you following Jermaine Dupri @LTLline and do you agree with his points?
BlogWorld Video Interview: Jermaine Dupri @LTLline on blogs, music & social media #bwe09ShareRelated posts:
23 Comments
We'd love to hear yours!
Leave a Reply
Here's your chance to speak.
Or Leave a Video Comment with Vidly:
Additional comments powered by BackType
















Visit My Website
October 18, 2009
Permalink
PokenGirl said:
BlogWorld Video Interview: Jermaine Dupri @LTLline on blogs, music & social med[..] – http://tinyurl.com/yknoye5 (via @waynesutton)
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from authorVisit My Website
October 18, 2009
Permalink
Vanessa said:
Nice job, Wayne! I love how candid Jermaine is. Great interview.
More from authorVisit My Website
October 18, 2009
Permalink
Jason Peck said:
Great stuff. I especially liked hearing him explain why he choose name LTLline instead of his name for his Twitter handle.
Visit My Website
October 19, 2009
Permalink
Jayson said:
Wayne I gotta say congrats, you ask some informative questions of Jermain Dupri, I was impress with your questions and your delivery. He seems to get the Social Media concept and really wants to stay connected to those lifers as he says. Great Job.
More from authorVisit My Website
October 19, 2009
Permalink
JaysonFlint said:
RT @waynesutton BlogWorld Video Interview: Jermaine Dupri @LTLline on blogs, music & social media #bwe09 http://bit.ly/4EZNHS
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from authorVisit My Website
October 19, 2009
Permalink
Daniel said:
One interesting point he made was that people spend all day looking at digital conversations.
If celebrities are seriously about, say, setting up a Twitter profile, they should really take this into consideration when they create content, interact with your audience, etc. If someone takes the time to comment, you may have to take the time to respond.
JD has a strong personal brand, and he interacts with all sorts of people on Twitter. He’s doing it the right way.
More from authorVisit My Website
October 19, 2009
Permalink
iFroggy said:
My buddy @waynesutton interviews Jermaine Dupri/@LTLline: http://bit.ly/3TqG8 (wanted to meet JD, didn’t get the chance).
This comment was originally posted on Twitter
More from authorVisit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
Former Staffer said:
Better then a sexy Cub Scout. Not much better, but better.
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
Victor said:
so you’re trying to ruin all sex amanda?
Not my bag, but plenty of consenting healthy adults have the whole teacher/student; parent/babysitter; infantilism etc. fetishes. Are you saying consenting adults can’t have these fetishes? Or they only can’t have them on halloween? Or they can’t have them if they do it sexily?
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
Former Staffer said:
Victor, do you just not get anything? All your comments are “you don’t get it”, “Big WTF”, etc.
Sexualizing children is wrong. Sexualization and role play is ok in a consenting adult relationship, but when done purely for attention (like on Halloween) is a cry for psychological help.
pretty simple really.
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
Victor said:
“Sexualizing children is wrong”
Last I heard, the woman above is over 18. “sexualizing children” is the act of dressing a child up or putting them in a situation in which their sexuality is the focus.
The above is an adult sexualizing childhood. How do you know why the consumer is wearing the outfit? Why are you so quick to assume it is for attention only? People use “dress up” situations such as halloween frequently to flirt with sexual fetishes and ideas which they don’t otherwise have the nerve to address. This would make her a consenting adult playing out a fetish she is curious about… and therefore, by your words “ok”
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
Mrs. D said:
Amanda, go check out CNBC’s “Top Halloween Costumes 2009.” http://www.cnbc.com/id/33177444/
While some of the costumes MUST be sexy (like “wench/vixen/tart”), others (”cop,” etc.) do not HAVE to be, heck, they don’t even have to be portrayed by WOMEN, but are portrayed that way in the article anyway! Ludicrous!
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 21, 2009
Permalink
EmC said:
noooooooo!!
OH MY GOD. why can’t they just stop it already??
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 22, 2009
Permalink
Christina said:
Creepy and I’m with “Former Staffer” on this.
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
More from authorVisit My Website
October 22, 2009
Permalink
julia said:
yeah, victor clearly does not get it or is just a troll. it is pretty fucking clear why this HALLOWEEN costume is offensive, and it has nothing to do with judging what people want to do in their own bedrooms.
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
More from authorVisit My Website
October 22, 2009
Permalink
Victor said:
??
Are you just automatically offended by everything Amanda tells you to be offended by, julia? Think of the previous costumes, which either 1 – depicted sexual assault (flashing) 2- depicted public sex acts, usually involving the sexual gratification of a male; 3 – stereotyped specific ethnic or racial groups. Now, how does this fit in with that grouping?
Would you be just as offended if a girl wore a more “authentic” brownie uniform for halloween? That certainly isn’t going to reduce the “infantilism” of the outfit, and it certainly wouldn’t make things less fetishized in the bedroom if she goes home with someone.
I find this column interesting, but I do feel it lacks some consistency in how it applies its “outrage”
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist
Visit My Website
October 22, 2009
Permalink
Victor said:
… and to call someone a “troll” simply because they refuse to be offended at everything you find offensive is a little silly.
This comment was originally posted on The Sexist